The Greatest Guide To h4831sc
The Greatest Guide To h4831sc
Blog Article
I picked up a 50ct. box of a hundred and sixty Nosler Accubonds, but I'm hesitant to burn the powder and projectiles on workup when all I've is fifty bullets. But I actually need to find a bullet while in the one hundred sixty class that my older rifle likes.
I've made use of H4831 (and H4831SC), and I use it. There aren't quite a few cartridges that I utilize it for as I look constantly to gravitate to other powders. Even so, I am unable to state that it does not get the job done. It is simply that Various other powders perform greater for any provided cartridge. As an illustration, while in the 280, H4831 gave me great velocity and really wonderful teams with Nosler 140 AB. Even so, RL19 was marginally much better in accuracy, although the velocity was pretty much similar.
Can they be interchanged without any anxieties other then employing standard load tactics when switching from ton to large amount?
Sweet!! I'll decide some up and give it a test. Thanks men, I take pleasure in it! I will let you understand what I figure out. I do have about a fifty percent pound of 4350 I am able to attempt that to start with and see what takes place.
My working experience is that the SC and SSC loaded to the same body weight because the very long Slash demonstrates a lowered velocity.
I do know, rough periods. H4831SC will definitely perform, I just didn't like the case density when loaded long. I do not try to remember powder demand off the very best of my head but I had been launching a Berger 168gr VLD at 3,000fps that is where I commonly aim to get. Within your case utilizing what you have (and what I ought to have completed) I'd personally begin with the end with the bearing surface h4831sc area of the bullet suitable on the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there as you discover a velocity node.
Hodgdon H4831SC (Short Slash) extruded rifle propellant is often a top choice for major video game hunters who use handloader rifles. Released from the fifties, this propellant has actually been enhanced with shorter grain measurements which makes it possible for greater powder circulation and a lot more uniformity.
Anyhow, I needed to give some 7828SC a attempt to lower a lot of the compression. What a blunder, I could not get this powder to shoot precisely or make the velocities I get with standard 7828.
I could stack em in a single gap but I wasn’t happy with the velocity. Soon after months, I acquired Fortunate and caught some H1000 on the internet not to mention paid a little extra. The very next 7 days at a gun demonstrate a guy experienced an entire situation of H1000 for $40 for every 1lb. I forget about the amount, but Together with the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a gentle load.
It truly is funny how over the years loading innumerable various cartridges in many different rifles that I have not h4831sc attained satisfactory end benefits with H-4831 or the limited-cut Model.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a reaction, and will be reviving an aged thread. Remember to take into consideration creating a new thread.
Yes, You should use exactly the same load data for H4831 vs H4831SC, however the SC Edition may well help you get a little bit far more in conditions where you are maxing out case quantity Along with the common powder in advance of reaching pressure limits.
Am i able to suppose that H4831 can be substituted for H4831sc ? I'm sure the Bodily change but will it have an effect on the melt away or velocity? I think not but I'm not a hundred% certain.
I discovered that my 7mag one hundred sixty partitions had been sub MOA with 4831sc with low to min charges. I’m conversing h4831sc load data 2700 (possibly 2800) fps, it was a small 60s grain cost inside a Norma circumstance. Not what I had been on the lookout for, but precise nonetheless.